The US Court of Appeals has has decided that in the future, instead of automatically granting a patent for a business practice, there will be a specific testing procedure to determine if that process is truly patentable. The decision is a nearly complete reversal of the State Street Bank decision in 1998, which started the rush to patent business practices.

When you hear the phrase "business practice" patents, think Amazon's "1-Click" process or Priceline.com's "name your own price". There have been questions about the validity of many of these patents, as some of them are clearly obvious or "normal daily procedures".

Certainly, software and service companies (read "Silicon Valley") stand to be hard hit by this change, as it may well invalidate many of their patents and thus decrease the value of their patent portfolio. Open source advocates will be very pleased with this decision.

For more information, check out the following links:
http://www.itexaminer.com/us-court-throws-out-most-software-patents...
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/federal-court-kills-patent...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081030150903555
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/10/30/court-reverses-position-on-busi...
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/07-1130.pdfs

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Jon....this subject might make for a good blog post.

Reply to This

RSS

Host Sponsor

Setting the Standards for Excellence and Ethics in Management Consulting.

Join Freshbooks today!

Institute of Management Consultants (IMC), NorCal on Twitter


Gold Sponsors

Easily find a time to meet with busy people.

For sponsorship opportunities please contact Brett LaDove

© 2010   Created by Brett LaDove.   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service